New Delhi: Minister of State in the PMO V Narayanasamy on Sunday accused former ISRO chairman G Madhavan Nair of misleading the nation by saying he was not given a chance to explain his case before the high level panel which indicted him and three other space scientists in the Antrix-Devas deal.
Narayanasamy pointed out that the committee, constituted by the Prime Minister under former Chief Vigilance Commissioner Pratyush Sinha to fix responsibility on officers who had signed the deal, had sent questionnaires to eight scientists about the deal, all of whom had given replies.
Following this, Nair had also met the head of the committee, and there was a personal hearing. The committee recommended that four scientists, including Nair should not be given any government assignment, he said.
However, Nair on Sunday said that the ISRO report on the Antrix-Devas deal is one-sided and claimed that the report does not bring out the facts.
"They have looked only at the papers and the answers to the questions. If they had seen some omissions, they should have sought clarifications. I will ask for the full report," he said while speaking exclusively to CNN-IBN.
"Speaking is not inquiry. The committee has not met many times to make the report. The report does not bring out the facts. The people who have made the report seems have not understood the issues and mechanism. Sad that bits and pieces of report are being put out like this and not the whole report," he added.
A committee set up by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) on Saturday night indicted Nair and three other senior scientists, who were barred from holding any government posts, for acts of commission in Antrix-Devas deal.
"We have to make inquires and see what are the options in front of us before we plan the future course of action. These are the findings of the committee, they are their own conclusion. I have not read the complete report, have to look at it. We were given only a questionaire to reply to, which we did," A Bhaskarnarayana, Ex-ISRO Scientific Secretary, said.
The report prepared by a committee headed by Pratyush Sinha, former Chief Vigilance Commissioner, said Antrix-Devas deal lacked transparency and recommended that action needs to be taken against Nair, A Bhaskaranarayana, KR Sridhara Murthi and KN Shankara all of whom have retired.
Nair said, "The committee does not understand space business. I'll wait and then decide what needs to be done. The statements in public domain are highly distortrd. The full reports should be out to make any conclusion. what is in public domain shows the report is one sided. There is no such statement that speaks of specific violations."
The former ISRO chief also said that the deal was not to profit Devas. "The return to government was a respectable business. Our responsibility was to get a new technology in the country. We were in the regime of embargo at the time of the deal. At that time this was the only group left to move forward on the agreement. It was a declared policy of the government to go out and expand in the field of space," he added.
The Antrix is the commercial arm of ISRO and Devas is a private firm. The five-member high level team, which was set up to examine the deal and identify the acts of omission and commission by government officials, said in its report made that "...there have not only been serious administrative and procedural lapses but also suggestion of collusive behaviour on the part of certain individuals and accordingly, responsibilities have to be fixed for taking action".
The Pratyush Sinha committee, set up on May 31 last year to examine the deal and identify the acts of omission and commission by government officials, said choosing Devas for the deal "seems to be lacking in transparency and due diligence".
It said "the approval process (for the deal) was riddled with incomplete and inaccurate information given to the union cabinet and the Space Commission". While the Antrix-Devas agreement was signed on January, 28, 2005, "this fact was not disclosed to the Space Commission or in the Cabinet note dated November 27, 2005, in which approval was sought for the launch of GSAT 6, one of the satellites to be build under the agreement".
The report said the terms of Antrix-Devas contract "were heavily loaded in favour of Devas". It pointed out that terms of the agreement entail that while in the case of the failure of the satellite, the risk was entirely that of Department of Space, the success of of the satellite would commit the latter to substantial expenditure".
Secondly, it said "it is surprising that for the purpose of arbitration Devas has been considered an international customer even though its registered address in the contract is shown as in Bangalore".
The report also noted that no clearance was obtained from the legal cells of the Department of Space and the Finance Ministry for Antrix-Devas deal, as is mandatory for any international agreement by any department of Indian government. The report also said GSAT capacity was earmarked for Devas without consulting INSAT Corporation Committee (ICC), which recommends use of satellite capacities by non-government users authorized to provide telecom services, which is a "clear violation of the government policy".
The committee report said "there is evidence to suggest that the Antrix-Devas agreement was not disclosed to Technical Advisory Group (TAG) at the time of considering the experimental trials".
There is no indication of any attempt to identify other possible partners for providing the same service even though similar services were available in some other countries, said the report.
"Although SATCOM policy and ICC guidelines allow leasing of satellite capacity on first-come-first-served basis, this did not prevent Antrix-ISRO from following a transparent process of adequately publicising its intent of supporting such services..." it said.
"In the absence of such a declaration of intent, choosing Devas seems to be lacking in transparency and due diligence", added the report.
With Additional Inputs From PTI
Comments
0 comment